Mark just sent me an article by Alex Cox that talks about what he thinks went wrong with the contemporary western, so i thought i'd link it and keep the western talk around here going a little while longer. i reckon. the article is called A Bullet in the Back and it's worth reading. Cox's "Repo Man" was a high school favorite of mine and spent a while in my Top Ten list, so i'm more than a little confused about the convention-busting that seems to be bothering him in this article. this from a man who's hero's last line in "Repo Man, in response to his love-interest's question, "what about our relationship?"
Otto: "Fuck that!"
i guess he makes some points about good intentions gone bad, but the article kind of meanders around what i think his main point is. if i'm reading it right, he says that Sam Peckinpah and "Once Upon A Time In The West" and violent Eastwood westerns (and i'm sure "Dead Man" and all the "Djangos" and "Unforgiven" would all be anti-westerns that would fit nicely in his thesis) have made the western film unpopular with the masses and therefore unmarketable? if so......so what? i mean, does he want big popular westerns dominating the mainstream? that would just be more popular movies for me to avoid. hell, i think westerns should move even further toward the fringes. i'm not concerned with their popularity, or their nobility. i just want to see men with guns running around in the mud like fucking cavemen.
and the first photograph he talks about? of Sam on the set of "Pat Garrett" with the i.v. drip of alcohol? that was an ad that Peckinpah, himself, took out in some newspaper to respond to rumors that he was drunk on the set. he staged the picture and took out the ad to show he wasn't drinking (even though, of course, he probably was) and that picture is kind of a well-known fact about Peckinpah. i'm surprised Cox talks about it out of context like it's a smoking gun that he's a drunk. no shit, dude. he made his best stuff drunk. okay, that photograph clearly made Cox think about westerns 'n stuff, and that's all good, but you know how i was saying the other day that "Cable Hogue" was my favorite western by him? forget all that. i was wrong. I just watched "Bring Me The Head of Alfredo Garcia" again for the 10th time, and i forgot that THAT'S my favorite one. you know why? because not only is Sam clearly drunk and insane and methodically trying to be subversive and contrary to what is expected in a western film (at least i consider "Alfredo Garcia" to be a western since it's got all the western staples) he also seems to be less interested in making what anyone would consider a coherent MOVIE. you ever read reviews of "Garcia" back from the time it came out? of course now it's considered a forgotten classic, but back then it was evidence that Pecinpah had truly lost him mind. and if that contributes to the decline of the western as an indentifiable genre, i say that's GOOD.
i mean, i'm only drawn to westerns for the same reason i'm drawn to the "Mad Max" movies:
because it is a brightly-lit wide-open space full of grizzled men of few words surrounded by a violent story that has been stripped down to its basics. i could give a shit about the heroism and tradition or whatever that's attached to its memory or the grand glory days of westerns. if that's really Cox's gripe, i'm not with him. and why did "Brokeback Mountain" upset him so much? he should ask himself why. who ever said that was a western anyway? that doesn't look to me to have a single thing to do with westerns except for the fact that they're wearing cowboy hats and ride horses. how does that make a western? i'm pretty sure there's not a single gunfight or horse theft in that movie. it looks like a dull love story to me. and he misses the simplicity and nobility of John Wayne westerns? why? the only good one was "The Searchers" and maybe "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance." you know why that is? because they fucked with the conventions in those two movies. "Searchers" had the racist, obsessed Wayne hunting down his neice for anything but noble reasons (to kill her because she was raped by indians!? thanks for the rescue, Uncle John!) and "Liberty Valance" attacked the idea of myth and storytelling by saying that the people that love a feel-good story with the perfect ending are wrong, and maybe stupid, too.
every western i own or watch over and over and over is, without exception, a seriously-skewed, fucked-up western. for example, but not including Sam Peckinpah's movies because they go without saying and that's a whole other post:
"One-Eyed Jacks" (cowboys are completely baffled by the ocean!) "Last Man Standing" (dead horse in the street for the whole flick!) "The Quick and the Dead" (daughter tries to shoot the rope hanging her dad! oops!) "Utu" (a fucking four-barrelled shotgun!!!) "The Missouri Breaks" (hero cuts the bad guy's throat while he's sleeping!) "Wild Bill" (don't fuck with Lebowski's hat!) "Vera Cruz" (Burt Lancaster threatens to kill a bunch of children!) "Extreme Prejudice" (tries, and fails, to top "Wild Bunch" with TWO machine guns!) "Quigley Down Under" (Magnum shoots the villain last 'cause he can't shoot for shit!) "Hud" (Paul Newman's an asshole!) "Django Kill" (bad guy shot with gold bullets so his goons will tear him apart!) "High Plains Drifter" (paints the town red, names it "Hell," makes a midget mayor!) "Unforgiven" (dude gets shot, then seems to cry for water for half an hour!) "Ravenous" (cannibalism in the old west ain't bad!! it gives you super powers!!!)
hell, i'd even include "Tombstone" just for Val Kilmer's freaky, simpering perfomance alone. and you know what? fuck it. i ain't afraid to say it:
"Young Guns!" both of 'em!
i like these westerns for the same reason that i like every other genre movie. because they're different than the rest. and you know why everyone and their dad still talks TO THIS DAY about Val Kilmer's Doc Holiday? because it shit all over what the idea of a lethal gunfighter should be. that's why nobody remembers Kevin Costner's "Wyatt Earp" from the same year even though you could argue that it's a better-made movie. but it was a story told with way too much repect for the western to be remembered.
it sounds like Alex Cox would love "Silverado" but be "troubled" by, say, "El Maricahi." hell, "El Mariachi," "Desperdo," and "Once Upon A Time in Mexico" are clearly part of the problem Cox has -- westerns made by a young smart-ass with a HUGE love of westerns and therefore unable to stop fucking with the formula until it's completely bonkers. and i still think that's a good thing.
you know, i was working on my western script two days ago and here's what i did for ideas: i made a loooooooong list of things that you see in every single western (a hanging, a campfire, a shootout, a duel, a favorite horse, etc.) and i changed these things to make it all fucked-up, something that was touched on (barely) in "The Unforgiven" when they did things like shoot the guy on the toilet and felt bad about it later. and i have an impulse to do this because i love westerns, and i have an unbearable urge to shit on their most well-known conventions. which is what (i think) Cox says is bad. my love for westerns and my knowledge and enjoyment of every cliché i've seen in these movies (don't misunderstand me, i WANT to see the hanging and the duel and the campfire) has given me an undeniable urge to gleefully piss all over the formula as a tribute.
and the title of the article? is that supposed to be a bad thing? "A Bullet in the Back" is a great thing! Hackman knew this in "The French Connection!" i still laugh every time i see one! the only thing that i can think of that is more satisfying that someone shooting someone else in the back when you don't expect it, is if someone lit someone on fire instead:
"Hey, you wouldn't light me on fire when I wasn't lookin', would ya, Billy?"
WHOOSH!
i would piss my fucking pants if i saw that in a movie! you know what? i'm putting that in my western script. right now. just like that. i will make it fit in somewhere. i will hammer it until it fits because it's funny.
dude, i might (add more to this) and blog this email, too. i'm enjoying our western debate this week. we should do a back-and-forth western disussion on both our blogs. like a point/counterpoint. or like a he said/he said thing!
"i'll be the woman if you want." - "Brokeback Mountain"
you watch "Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid" yet? isn't this your little vacation weekend? you better talk about it when you do. hey, you know what i'd rather watch than "High Noon" or "Chisum" any day? "The Rundown." i like that movie. i especially like the way it says guns are bad...until you finally use them!?!? i haven't been that confused by an anti-violence message in a movie since Ice Cube put away his gun and picked up that brick in "Friday!" cause, like, a brick ain't that dangerous, right? and "The Rundown" is sort of a western, and i'd like it even more if they'd kept its original, more-westernish title "Helldorado!"
now THAT'S a sweet name for a movie. that's what i heard they call it overseas.
got to talk about the last and next radio shows. that new station's shiny-new equipment is in constant turmoil. i miss the huge, dusty gear at the old radio station more and more.